Gemstone
Gathering
The
7th Gemstone Gathering will take place on October 24th, 2007
about
" The Identification of Rare Pearls and Pearl Treatments "
By
Mr. Ken Scarratt
Director
of GIA Research Thailand

This
presentation begins by describing a current project where GIA is assisting
the discoverers of a significant pearl find. Blue Water Ventures of
Key West, Florida, in searching the sunken wreck of the Santa Margarita
(which was lost in the year 1622) uncovered a lead box that was found
to contain thousands of natural pearls. The Santa Margarita, one of
a fleet of ships that sailed the Caribbean calling at ports in Panama,
Honduras and Mexico in search of “riches” to adorn the wealthy
of Europe, was one of many that fell foul of the hurricane seasons common
to that region.
The
discovery is significant both from historic and a gemological perspectives.
Of interest gemologically is that the most likely producing mollusk
for these natural pearls is Pinctada imbricata, and as such providing
an extraordinarily rare opportunity to examine pearls from a historically
significant origin.

The
presentation summed-up the preliminary gemological results of the investigation
with detailed images one of the pearls, the UV/visible reflectance spectrum
and chemistry. The latter showed that Pb had been transferred from the
box to the pearl.
The
presentation then described two very unusual discoveries of pearl-encrusted-shells.
These discoveries were displayed in the form of detailed microradiographs
that revealed in the first case a distinct scallop shell at the center
of a button shaped natural pearl from Pinctada maxima, and the second
showed the shell of a gastropod, also at the enter of a natural pearl.
These two examples, while being exceedingly rare, exemplify why one
should not be pedantic about the origins (or reasons for formation)
of natural pearls.

Moving
then to the core subject of the presentation a wide of variety natural
pearls from a myriad of pearl producing mollusks were described. Data
presented included, color, appearance and surface structures as well
as UV/visible, Raman spectra and chemical analyses. While identification
criteria that established the producing mollusk for many of the pearls
were clearly established for others it was a work-in-progress.


The
theme statement behind this presentation being “understanding
pearls and their growth is key to the development of identification
criteria for those that are uncommonly encountered”. The pearls
and pearl producing mollusks described included;
Crassostrea virginica
Pinctada mararitifera
Pinctada maxima
Pleuroploca gigantea
Pleuroploca trapezium
Lopha cristagalli
Nautilus pompilius
Lambis truncata
Isognomon attenuata.
Atrina vexillium
Pinna nobilis
Tridacna gigas
Strombus gigas
Melo aethiopica
Melo amphora
Melo broderipii
Melo georginae
Melo melo
Codakia tigerina
Mercinaria mercinaria
Nodipecten nodosus
Placopecten magellanicus
Periglypta (Venus) magnifica
Oliva bulbiformis
Cypraea tigis
Haliotis dohrniana
Haliotis asinina
Chicoreus ramosus
Cymatium pileare
Fusinus undatus
Littorina littorea
Modiolus philippinarum
Mytilus edulis edulis
Spondylus regius
Spondylus versicolor
Chamidae
It
was emphasized that those described represented a mere snapshot of the
potential possibilities.

The
presentation then moved to treatments applied to pearls and the procedures
used to identify these. Beginning with the common and easily identified
treatments; firstly dyeing by various methods, including silver nitrate,
was described and through images how such treatments could be identified
via the observation of color concentrations on the surface of pearls,
particularly in the areas of blemishes and the entrances of drill holes.
It was shown how silver nitrate dyeing could be determined through the
“reversal” of growth structures on a microradiograph or
through chemical analysis.
Both
natural and cultured pearls may contain large voids which may be treated
by the filling of these areas with anything from wax to metal balls
or wire. These treatments were revealed in the microradiographic images
of the individual pearls.

A
popular color for cultured pearls today is brown – often referred
to as “chocolate”. While such colors do occur naturally
they are quite rare and therefore the majority of the cultured pearls
described as “chocolate pearls” in the market today are
a product of a treatment process. One of these treatments is described
as “bleaching” and the other is by dying with “silver
nitrate”. The appearance of these treated pearls and the treatment
identification procedures were presented with the key criteria being
linked with, UV/visible spectroscopy, chemistry and UV fluorescence.
A
new (experimental) treatment was then described whereby some pearls
are coated with a thin transparent mixture of aluminum oxide and titanium
dioxide. The layers being from between 0.3µm to 3µm they
are said to be either chemical or wear resistant dependant on the formula
used. Identification criteria presented included chemical analyses and
fluorescence, although it was emphasized that the coatings currently
examined were not visible under normal gemological microscope magnifications.
The
presentation then moved to the spectroscopic identification of treatments
applied to golden (yellow) cultured pearls, these including UV/visible
and Raman data. In conclusion two of the most topical treatments were
presented and discussed, these being the bleaching to white of cultured
pearls and luster enhancement. Identification criteria for both were
briefly discussed.

A
good evening was had by all participants and GIA Thailand looks forward
to seeing all at the next Gathering in November. The title is "Diamond
Cutting Facilities in New York" on Thursday, November 29, 2007
at GIA Thailand Campus.